In 2018, it was 40th anniversary of China's reform and opening up. Since 1978, the Chinese people have written the magnificent epic of national and national development with their hands in the following 40 years. Today, China has become the second largest economy and the largest industrial country in the world. As an important branch of the field of national industrial equipment manufacturing, engineering machinery, although it started relatively late, after decades of development, China has become the world's largest engineering machinery market, and China's engineering machinery industry system is also constantly improving and improving technology innovation capability.
The development trend of the construction machinery and the Chinese industry is very good, but we still have to face the problems existing in the engineering machinery and the industrial field in China. If we do not solve these problems, we can not break through the bottleneck of "big and not strong" in China's industry, and the Chinese engineering machinery enterprises will have the "key lifeline" by others to hold on to the end. Pain.
In recent years, several concepts have been heated up, such as "German industry 4", "made in China 2025", "artificial intelligence" and so on. Let's briefly state the relationship between "German industrial 4" and "made in China 2025" and the origin of these concepts. As we all know, Germany is a powerful industrial manufacturing country in the world. Whether it is the category of industrial products or the quality of products, it is the bull's eye of the world. However, in the forty years of China's reform and opening up, the rapid development of China's manufacturing, from the original price to win, and now also began to emphasize the quality and quality, "made in China" has been obviously changed to "China intelligence". China's industry is already aiming at Germany and is catching up.
In view of this background, Germany began to reinvigorate the influence of its industrial manufacturing, so there was a scene of the future industrial intelligent production application of "German industry 4", while China did not fall behind, and the development strategy of "China made 2025" was developed to target German industry.
Indeed, whether for Chinese industry or China's construction machinery, we have made great achievements in the past decades. However, if we are more rational and a little more calm, we will find that many of our achievements and achievements are focused on the application, and that we are not in the predominance of the core concepts and key technical aspects of industry and engineering machinery. This also leads to what we often say, "China's industry is big but not strong, and China's construction machinery is also big but not strong."
The level of a country's industry is the foundation of the country's comprehensive national strength. Germany's industrial level is superb. It has a very deep accumulation of technology. For example, in the field of engineering machinery, if the output is single, the three big Chinese enterprises, Xugong, 31, and ZOOMLION, the number of products produced and sold by the three are invincible. However, in many large international construction projects, they will be designated to Caterpillar, Komatsu and Ri Lijian. Machinery, Liebherr and other world construction machinery giant products and equipment. This is our gap, are you not? You can't do it if you don't accept it.
Of course, we Chinese can raise their heads and say stubbornly that they are dissatisfied. But what is more important is to find out where the gap is.
Let's start with differences at the basic level. This is also the deadliest gap between China and Germany. That is the accumulation of industrial level and details mentioned above, which is more manifested in the research of basic materials. Taking engineering machinery as an example, the difference between the materials it used and the basic research for these materials is very large. The same engine is used by Chinese manufacturers. Some Chinese research institutes are only studying its equipment structure and working links. Foreign countries, especially Germany, have not stopped the development of engines, and they also involve product design concepts and ideas. It is no wonder that foreign counterparts say that China may be the largest market for engine protection, but the change in engine products that will take place across the times must come from abroad. Although this statement is absolutely absolute, it is quite pertinent in general.
Next is the difference between the user of the product or the user of the device. We mentioned the "German industry 4" and "China made 2025" mentioned in the previous article. For Germany to achieve its "industrial 4", the author thinks this is difficult for Germany, which is a problem of time. Because Germany has a large number of skilled industrial workers, it can be upgraded to "industry 4". For China, it is a long way to go to achieve the goal of "made in China 2025". The reason why I have such two attitudes, the key to the problem, is in a word, "Lan Xiang technical school is not too much, but too little." Many enterprises say they are boosting the realization of the goal of "made in China 2025", but ultimately only rely on people to accomplish this goal.
Have you ever thought of the number of Chinese industrial workers engaged in industrial production? How many of them are skilled in technology? If we want to complete the upgrading of an industry, there must be a large proportion of industrial workers to support it. Therefore, we can not despise the "Lan Xiang technical school" without any assertion. I believe that if we want to truly achieve the vision of "made in China 2025", then "Lan Xiang technical school is not too much, but too little."
From the view of the engineering machinery industry, which one of the famous engineering machinery service engineers in the industry has not really grown up after a long time operation training and countless visits to the maintenance site? Some of them even finished the "hearing discrimination" to diagnose the stunt of repairing engineering machinery and equipment. Among the many industry service personnel I interviewed, some of the engineers were specialized in repairing fire machines and were burnt out by the fire. And not many others, it is just engineering machinery that complex circuit repair requires deep professional reserve and repair experience.
Therefore, the "big and not strong" of Chinese industry and engineering machinery is asked to improve the level of Chinese industry only from the industrial base to the quality of the practitioners. We really should not be unjustifiable to disdain Lan Xiang and other technical colleges and universities, because there is no service engineer, there is a failure engineering machinery, can not be used, it is a pile of scrap iron. These grass-roots industries can really promote the main force of industrial development.
